RSS Feed

Tag Archives: review

Review: ‘Zone One,’ by Colson Whitehead

I wanted to read this book. I tried my very best, but it stymied me no matter how many times I tried to come back to it. I think I know why.

Remember those stupid mash-up books? Android Karenina, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, Shakespeare v Lovecraft? Those books, which you saw in the horror section and never bothered to look at because they looked stupid, even though they’d attracted a lot of attention just because of the idea?

Zone One is a mash-up. It’s not a literary horror novel. A literary horror novel is Blood Meridian, The Last Werewolf, or The Fifth Child (Doris Lessing). A literary horror novel is not a blending of styles because literary anything is not a style, but a quality. Literary just means good writing with good vocabulary.

The people who marketed Zone One tricked readers into thinking this a blending of styles, of genres, but it is really a mash-up: a brutal and turgid amalgam of one type of book with another.

Have you ever wandered a bookstore looking for something to read? You pick up this book, that book, reject a lot of them, and try not to trip over those strange people who seemed to live in the modern big-box bookstore.

Occasionally, you come across this: a thick, dense book with the photo of earnest young man (often sporting boxy glasses and a pony tail) in the back author photo. He’s gone to Harvard and received  an MA in Comparative Lit, written for the Village Voice and Mother Jones, and in between those jobs many writers would sell their children to get he’s written a novel. It’s been praised by Updike, Joyce Carol Oates, and you’d better not miss out on his Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius or you’re a godamn ignoramus.

So you buy it. I mean, how can you not? Anyone who’s anyone loved it.

Then you try to read it. Immense run-on paragraphs, shifting perspectives, over-boiled prose, and the words! Strings of huge words that could be replaced by one small word. Tiresome father issues, cardboard female characters, and digressions that run on for pages. Thinking ‘it can’t be just me,’ you end up running to Amazon and google for more reviews. I must be stupid if I hate this book, you think, I’m a dinosaur and this guy is part of the new wave. So you keep on trying to read it, growing over more tired and angry at this autobiographical exercise in youthful logorrhoea. At some point, you stop reading it and put it on your shelf. Strangely enough, no one ever asks you how it was.

Zone One is one of those earnest books from lauded young writers of whom most readers have never heard, and it’s been mixed with zombies. I don’t think Colson Whitehead intentionally set out to write a mash-up, but since he is the poster child for hip and impressive young authors, he wrote one of those mash-ups simply by adding zombies.

Here are a few whoppers:

The youngest one wore its hair in a style popularized by a sitcom that took as its subject three roommates of seemingly immiscible temperaments and their attempts to make their fortune in this contusing city.

Gina was that new species of celebrity emerging from the calamity, elevated by the altered definitions of valor and ingenuity. 

One of those seekers powerless before the seduction of the impossible apartment that the gang inexplicably afforded on their shit-job salaries, unable to resist the scalpel-carved and well-abraded faces of the guest stars the characters smooched in one-shot appearances or across multi-episode arcs. Struck dumb by the dazzling stock footage of the city avenues at teeming evening.

There’s lots more where those came from, but you get the drift.

Literary writing should have a lightness to it. It’s not like low-fat food; after all, french chefs have been making fluffy things out of heavy fat for hundreds of years. As dense as the ideas are, the writing should dance on the tongue, not lie on the plate like a bad boiled dumpling. Literary writing shouldn’t be so… consciously written, so desperate to impress. It should look like the author is a genius who can’t help but write with impeccable style and syntax, and above all, a correct understanding of the flavours and limits of words.

Look, here. Here’s a line from Lolita.

I was still walking behind Mrs. Haze though the dining room when, beyond it, there came a sudden burst of greenery,”the piazza,” sang out my leader, and then, without the least warning, a blue sea-wave swelled under my heart and, from a mat in a pool of sun, half-naked, kneeling, turning about on her knees, there was my Riviera love peering at me over dark glasses.

Or Joyce! Check this out. Just a little bit.

In the intense instant of imagination, when the mind, Shelley says, is a fading coal, that which I was is that which I am and that which in possibility I may come to be. So in the future, the sister of the past, I may see myself as I sit here now but by reflection from that which then I shall be.

I’m being cruel in comparing Whitehead to the great writers of the last century, but I feel like I should, if only to show the direction in which he should be pointing. Writing is not about vocabulary, it’s about rhythym, the dance of the words on the page. It’s hard to describe, but so easily missed. That quality is not to be confused with poetry, but the magic is drawn from the same well.

Oh, and the plot. It’s all right, I guess. It follows the life of one Mark Spitz, a soldier in an army charged with clearing downtown Manhattan of the walking dead. Alongside the traditional biting dead are strange creatures who are stuck repetitively performing tasks they did while alive. Nice idea, although it owes a lot to George Romero in Dawn of the Dead, in which zombies endlessly roam a shopping mall.

Glenn Campbell reviewed this book for the New York Times, and he said it got better as it progressed. Maybe he was right, but I was too frustrated to find out.

Review: ‘Neuropath,’ by R. Scott Bakker

About a week ago, I took issue with a woman named acrackedmoon, who talked shit about R. Scott Bakker, a sci-fi/fantasy writer. I thought she said nasty, personal things about him, all of which centred around his book Neuropath.Her comments were ridiculously and offensively personal and unnecessary, but recently she wrote a calm and reasoned review about a book called Water Logic, by Laurie Marks, and she sounded not at all shrill and hateful. I went out and bought the series, due to that review (She also wrote a review for a book called Silently and Very Fast, by Catheryn Valente, and made it sound agonizingly boring and precious, even though she sort of liked it).I also bought Neuropath. Why? Because although Peter Watts defended Bakker, and so did I, neither of us had ever read Neuropath. So I thought I should do so, and give a more objective review. Once you’ve accused a writer of masturbating with his own poo, or compared him to a piglet with diarrhea, you’ve lost all credibility. So I read Neuropath(and will start Fire Logic right after I write this) and here’s the review.————————

It’s the future; a realistic, depressing future. Things are chugging along, or perhaps winding down: eco-terrorism, the destruction of part of Moscow, the inevitable China crisis.

The protagonist, Thomas Bible, is a Washington psychologist who teaches at Columbia. He is approached by a team of FBI agents on the trail of a serial near0-surgical torturer who does gross things like re-wire the pleasure centres of porn stars so they masturbate with broken glass, burn away the ability to recognize faces or even other humans, and program the face of God into the mind of religious fundamentalists. The feds are positive that the culprit is Neil Cassidy, Bible’s oldest friend ( their so close that Cassidy called Bible ‘Goodbook’, and Bibles’s kids the ‘Little Gideons’). When presented with the evidence, and the knowledge that Cassidy has been working for the government to perform radical brain-circuitry alterations on terrorists, Bible has to admit that it’s true: his best friend is a serial killer and a visionary.

In college, Bible and Cassidy came up with The Argument: a smug doctrine that insists that all free will, emotion, consciousness, is essentially fake, illusory, and we are nothing but brains ‘buzzing against each other.’ Only a sliver of the brain is devoted to consciousness, and the machinery that makes it  possible to invisible to us. The soul doesn’t exist; we barely exist, save as an efficient gloss to cover and justify (through confirmed biases and truths) our own competitive actions. We are only products of neural processes; we are little better than machines with some illusory programming on the top. Cassidy is on a mission to prove that he can make anyone do anything, feel anything, and want anything, by making his victims do, want, and feel impossible things. He seems to be intent on messing with Bible, his closest friend, in the most personal ways possible. Bible’s ex-wife and family come under threat, and the chase is on. This is, after all, a thriller.

As I read further into this book, I could feel myself recoiling – not because of the concepts (which some might find disturbing), but the writing.

Fucking bitch! Fuck-fuck-fucking cunt-whore-bitch!

In the dark Agent Atta’s look was hard and handsome in the way of solid women. Something in her eyes told Thomas that she enjoyed pointing her gun.

After he came across Sam’s breasts, the camera focused on the widow. She smeared pearl across her nipples then lifted her veil to lick her fingertips. Her face was at once hooker-hard and high-school soft. Beautiful, yet plain in the way of abused children—

“What kind of people might those be, Ger?”  ”Smart-ass, know-it-all, arrogant pricks, with their terrorist sympathies, their hobosexual neighbours—” “Hobosexual?”  ”Bum fuckers! Fags!”

As blank as a porn star between takes. So sweet. So sweet. At long last, you mean only what I want you to mean

Your blood is not so hot as my semen.

There is nothing techically wrong in the writing; there are no boners of pronoun intent, nothing dangling, nothing broken. Yes this is egregious writing that induces discomfort and embarrassment. It’s sexual, but humourless and bald, and sort of reminds me of church ladies who try to get down and sing old Negro Spirituals and send the young people running for the church doors. There is an afterword for the book; it’s very dense and wordy. I’m often struck by the writing of educated people with large vocabularies: in theory they can write immense, logorrheic paragraphs, and yet when they have to write regular, simple prose they can’t help but come up with ‘There was something matronly and more than a little condescending about her demeanor’, or ‘For a pulse-pounding moment’, or ‘The fact that he was attracted to her said precious little: she was a fox, after all, and he was in the middle of the most emotionally tumultuous episode of his life.’ Good writing is to be able to transmit information simply, within the context of what is happening. Too much of the non-digressive parts of Neuropath seem forced and written to fill space.

Neuropath veers between halfway dense psycho-jargon about consciousness to hockey, forced dialogue and stereotyped characters: the Nietzschean philosopher-prince bad guy who’s smarter than everyone, the fuck-bunny blonde federal agent, the cute gay neighbour, the dumb religious blockhead cop, the humourless female agent who might be a lesbian, and the faithless, forever-wronging and shaming ex-wife.

Much has been made of Neuropath’s infamous sexism. The main female character is first used as a sounding board for the educated male protagonist’s expoundings, then fucked by him, then raped by him because he’s feeling stressed about the abduction of his son, although the novel ‘justifies’ Bible’s terrible treatment of her with a very ridiculous switcheroo. The cute gay neighbor, prone to fey one-liners, is used almost exclusively for babysitting to get the kids out of the plot until they’re needed, or to drive Thomas Bible to safety. Bible’s ex-wife, Norah, is laughably treacherous, slutty and shrewish. For some reason, nurses are given a real working over: ‘Stupid surly nurses,’ ‘… two nightshift nurse who seemed to be too caught up in gossiping to notice their presence’, ‘ … the neurological observation unit’s duty nurse—a once-pretty woman named Skye, if he remembered correctly.’

I take issue with your philosophical writings

I could tell you a few things about the inner mind…

The novel’s central premise is overheated. A lot of us are atheists. We’re not offended or frightened by knowing that if you screwed with our wiring, we’d act differently; we are fine with that. The same thing happens if you mess with our iPhones. We’re not alarmed to know that we are our brains and that is where our soul, if we have one, resides. We know we’re tribal, and that we confirm our own biases. It’s not that freaky.

And that accusation that much of our will and emotions are illusory – that is like saying that the flavour in food is an illusion that is secondary to our intake of protein and carbohydrates. I will still enjoy my French bread, even if it’s nothing but flour and water. I’ll still enjoy my Indian food, even if it’s little more than rice and beans with shredded plant seeds that activate my neural processes. I don’t care if you inform me they’re illusory; I will still enjoy them. I know I am my circuitry.

This is not to say that R. Scott Bakker is an awful person, or that he is piece-of-shit misogynist. He may very well be a perfectly nice person who happens to have written a book that I didn’t like. I will take a look at Prince of Nothing, because that series might be better, and because Bakker is a Canuck.

Review: ‘Jack’s Magic Beans,’ By Brian Keene

      Jack’s Magic Beans is the title story of a small collection by extreme horror writer Brian Keene. A small group of of people are trapped in supermarket walk-in freezer as the world outside goes murderously insane. The big twist? The four people, the only characters not murdering, are on prozac. Prozac might be what keeps them from going mad.

The action starts quickly, with one of those sentences for which authors are always patting themselves on the back: ‘The lettuce started talking to Ben Mahoney halfway through his shift at Save-A-Lot.’ It tells him to curbstomp an old lady, which he does, after which Ben is killed with a broom-handle. ‘Then everybody started dying at once.’ Which doesn’t happen, of course. In this story, people die sequentially; in quick succession, perhaps, but not at the same time.

‘When Jack woke up, people were screaming. Several of them, by the sound.’ Of course there were several of them – hence the plural noun ‘people’! Much of Jack’s Magic Beans is littered with either tautologies like this, or strangely bald, artless descriptions that, much like your new girlfriend’s weird dad, suck the air from the room. “His head had been bashed in by a coffee-maker. Jack knew because the bloody appliance lay next to the corpse.” “Dead bodies littered the floor, sometimes three high. The few areas without corpses were littered with pieces of them.”

By the time the title story was over, I had somewhat acclimatized to the writing, which is short, pulpy, and bland. I sailed through the rest of the collection very quickly. After the first story, there was a a quick romp about a man who is graphically unable to kill himself, although the real horror might be how miserably unhappy he is with his fat wife. Two connected tales after that about a serial killer (“I am an Exit,” and “This is not an Exit),that might be killing to keep the world safe. They’re decent, but the killer sounds a little too much like a comic-book villain to inspire fear or even the cheap heebie-jeebies (‘Indeed, I prefer to act quickly these days. A shot in the dark. A knife to the back. Burn them as they sleep.’)

The final story is a little better. A man and wife (and they’re unhappy. I think Brian Keene would be at his best writing a long-form novel about the horrific breakdown of a marriage, although he’d have to improve his writing) go see a play in which famous dead musicians star as characters from tales by Lovecraft, Ambrose Bierce, and Robert Chambers. Hearing those famous horror memes (Carcosa, Hyades, The Lake of Hali) is invigorating, but in the end the functional horror is quick and cheap.

In his many notes, Keene writes that most of these stories were older, and that he’d brushed them off for this collection. If that’s so, I’d like to read something recent that he’s really worked on, like Girl on a Glider. 

Review: ‘Floating Staircase,’ by Ronald Malfi

If you were to google ‘floating staircase’, you would find a neat indoor feature: steps without any visible means of support, so they look ghostly. Here’s a lovely firm that specializes in them.

The staircase in Ronald Malfi’s ‘Floating Staircase’ is a marooned wooden dock staircase stuck in the ice, in the middle of lonely New England lake. It’s unfortunate that this quiet, accomplished book is being neglected by the Google giant because of wealthy people’s obsession with art-deco homes.

Travis Glasgow, a decently successful author, has recently moved from London to Westlake, Maryland. He and his wife want an affordable house and a better quality of life. Floating Staircase goes deep in Stephen King country: the new arrivals in the small town, the frightening lake and woods, the main character being a writer, the reflexive trophs concerning the written word, its power to hurt and to uncover the truth, the gregarious old man in the mould of Jud Crandall, and the protagonist’s adherence to the truth at all costs.

It’s not hard to figure that the previous owners of the house were odd and frightening people. David and Veronica Dentman lived there, along with her autistic son Elijah. Elijah died when he tried to climb the eponymous staircase, but his body was never found. Or did he? Travis Glasgow, still psychically wounded because his own irresponsibility drowned his little brother Kyle when they were little, sees narrative parallels between the deaths of the two boys. He begins to poke around town, looking for clues, and runs afoul of David Dentman, Elijah’s hulking uncle, whom Travis suspects killed his nephew.

The prose is good, the exploration into the writer’s mind is accurate, touching and shows Malfi’s regard of Stephen King. But he could have used a better editor. In the first quarter of the book, there are a few embarrassing sentences like this: She was a smart, determined woman whose body bore the rearing of her two children with a mature, domestic sophistication. This is egregious act of ‘telling’, and it sticks out among all that fine writing.

As for the mystery? It’s not all the ground-breaking. It pales in comparison to Malfi’s exploration of Travis’s mind, and how he sought therapy and wandered the world until he found his ‘anchor.’ The death of a child inflicts wounds that bleed for decades, and alcohol and stonewalling only briefly suspend death. Much of the book is Travis’s desperate life-endangering struggle to help the dead Elijah, and ironically save himself.

The Bighead, by Edward Lee

“The Bighead licked his chops and tasted the dandy things: blood and fat, pussystink, the salt-slime of his own semen that he’d just slurped out’a the dead girl’s bellybutton.”

    And so begins the first Chapter of The Bighead, by Edward Lee.

    The Bighead is considered by some to be the grossest and most extreme horror novel ever written. It is possible to set out and write a book with more quantitative gore, but that misses the point of horror, the point of pornography (of which there is plenty in this book), and the hard-to-discern point where the two meet.

   A few things about porn for those of you who don’t know it. Porn cinema came into its own in the 70′s because it was shot on film, had a budget, and took itself seriously. The eighties came along, and any unemployed idiot with a video camera could make a miserable movie that looked like it was shot in a bathtub. Cue the millenium, and porn has gone purely digital. There is no upper electronic limit to the amount of porn one can make and consume, so porn companies have to stretch the limits. A scene with one women and two men becomes one woman and two hundred men (not exaggerating here, unfortunately). In bombarding the audience with the extremes, you make it harder to impress and/or upset because you’ve participated in heightening the audience’s tolerance. The erotic aspect is gone, and it’s only gymnastics and the spectacle of watching how much the human anatomy can distend.
    
    This happens in extreme horror. Some writers look at a novel like The Bighead, and grimly and joylessly go about topping it. That’s easy. Just measure the gore that is there and write more. That is not an achievement.

    Can you make pornography dirty, but still keep it sexy and funny? Can you write a horror novel that doesn’t turn your audience off by boring them? And can you write a novel that is horrible and pornographic and yet still enjoyable?

    The plot of The Bighead is unexpectedly complex. There’s baby-switching, sexual secrets, underwater tombs, phantom religious figures, torture, a duo of redneck serial killers named Balls and Dicky, but the most important thing to know is this: a massive backwoods cannibal mutant with a fourteen-inch penis is roaming through the book, raping and killing people. Towards the end we’re told he is not exactly human, but we figured that out anyway.
    
    All the good characters are ill in some way. Of the two female protagonists, one is a sex addict and the other’s sexual issue is barely spoken of, so we know it’s going to figure greatly in the plot. The priest in the book is sexually tortured by dream nuns. The monster and the serial killer rednecks, on the other hand, are well-adjusted in their raping, torturing and killing.

    The killings go on and on. Many of the victims are extremely young(one is unborn), and that bored, numb feeling starts to creep in early. I put a little failsafe mechanism in my head: Directive – read, move on, and forget this book that I read because it was ‘seminal’, or ‘classic’.

    The larger question for a book like this: what is too little or too much? If the book only covered one murder scene apiece for the Bighead and the two rednecks, then the book would have been shocking and horrific. Lee’s approach – to describe the same rape/cannibalism scene over and over again – works like a salt overdose. Soon we’re not shocked, just bloated and not hungry anymore.
  
    I will say this. There is a strange and elemental psychology running through this book. The obsession with genital size (and that forms a big twist in the plot); the childish, almost sing-song writing in the sections that detail the rape scenes; the sexual addictions; the constants spilling of every single fluid in the human body (nothing is missed, not even eyeball fluid), reminds me not so much of extreme horror, but of a child entering the fascination phase with its own body as it learns to use the bathroom and realizes that boys and girls are different from the waist down.

    I have witnessed a child of eight who stuffed all the dirty laundry into his pajamas and joyfully ran about the house with a crotch the size of a basketball. I’ve known kids who make long-form comics about pooping heroes who fight giant pooping butts. Some parents wage war so their children might keep their hands out their pants for even five minutes at the supper table. Little kids are like this, but it is strange to see this mentality in a book written ostensibly for adults.

    Is this good? I can’t say. Is it interesting? Yes.

    But should you catch someone reading The Bighead, don’t think badly of them. I might guess that – in an completely unexpected way – they are returning to a gleeful and gross part of their childhood where few books would venture. But Ed Lee will take you there.

Review: Chronicle (2012)

Chronicle, the new movie directed by Josh Trank, is a clever almagam of Alan Moore’s Miracleman and Stephen King’s Carrie. It could have used the self-conscious, wincingly hip approach of the latest Marvel comics movies, but it chooses story and depth instead. 
The movie begins with Andrew, a horribly awkward high school boy. His dad is an unemployed drunk and his mother is dying of what looks like Cystic Fibrosis. Andrew has no support; he is a statistical accident waiting to happen. Andrew buys an old shoulder-mounted camera to put a wall between him and the world he observes. Through his camera, we see Andrew’s handsome and brainy cousin Matt, his school, the bullies who make his life miserable, and the drug dealers who loiter outside Andrew’s house. 
One night, when Andrew takes his camera to a rave, he meets Steve, an athlete and budding politician, who persuades Andrew to take the camera down a strange cavern he and Matt have discovered in the woods. There’s something strange in there: a crystalline entity, device, or spaceship, that irradiates the three young men. Strange otherworldly sounds emanate from it; the boys touch it, wonder at it. The camera begins to malfunction.
When Andrew gets a new camera and begins recording again, the three boys, now fast friends, have developed nascent telekinetic powers. At first, they play dumb jokes: they remove gum from unwitting stranger ’s mouths, chase little girls with animated teddy bears, pull up girls’ skirts. Steve makes the obvious mental leap: If you can manipulate physical objects, why not your own body? In a breathtaking sequence reminiscent of Richard Donnner’s Superman, the three friends take to the sky. But it’s not an ethereal sequence: up above the clouds, the wind howls and they have to wear their hoods pulled tight around their faces. They fly fast as planes and pass and shoot a football back and forth, screaming in joy. 
For a little while, all is perfect and ideal. The three friends plan trips to Mali and Tibet, make touchingly earnest plans to improve Andrew’s social status and get him laid, and have the time of their lives. 
But nothing is ever perfect. Wherever power and beauty go, chaos and anger follow. As the powers of the three boys are representative of young, impulsive maleness in the bloom of puberty, Andrew’s dark side, his previous lack of friends and his father’s inability to provide, his sexual insecurity, his fear of never being special, explodes and his own power, far greater than his two friends, becomes a threat. 
I won’t reveal what happens next, although I’m sure you know. But no plot device is ever utilized cheaply: All characters, no matter what they do, are sympathetic and understandable. We are taught that power used only to destroy and hurt makes the user more lonely and sad than before. Like King’s Carrie, we see power mixed with angry youth, and like Moore’s Miracleman, we see a hero faced with destroying an angry young boy so the world might be saved. Chronicle goes from the Facebook digital age straight into breathtaking comic drama of the best kind, for comics satisfy our need for myth and the impossible. 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com